Ot was a truly wonderful interview Dan, Lucy was able to put herself and her experiences across in the best way possible and that's down to you,the inteviewer
Such a great interview Dan - leaving no stone unturned 👏. Lucy came across so articulate and calm explaining everything you asked of her . It was such a pleasure to see her free and you being her first port of call for an interview. Being our champion for free speech she was in the very best of hands with you 👏👏👏❤️🇬🇧
great stuff dan..... more and more people are slowly waking up to the very real danger of the online safety act as some of you are no doubt aware ive been banging the drum so to speak concerning the following petition on the uk government and parliament petition page...repeal the online safety act it currently has 528,474, signatures it urgently needs many more and YOU can help in getting them first be sure to sign it and most importantly be sure to reshare it widely all over the uk with as many like minded people as you possibly can and be sure to ask each one of them to do exactly the same as im asking you to do in this message....concerning the online safety act be sure to check out a page called the expose and in particular an article on there from yesterday concerning the online safety act its a must read article
Absolutely great show Dan, Lucy was brilliant i think the show will go viral well done. I also think that this will be the final nail in Starmer's coffins.
She’s so poised, such an articulate young woman. I’m so impressed with her in every way & I’m amazed at her calm demeanor.
I can’t imagine how I’d react to 380 days incarceration for expressing my thoughts. I’d love to think I’d behave as beautifully as Lucy but I don’t know if I could.
The only mistake she made was to plead guilty. The comment she posted was a statement about how she felt and I suspect a majority of the indigenous British population feel much the same way. I know I do.
As a former colleague of Kier Starmer, I can say with some confidence that I would not have authorised a charge against Lucy Connolly. It is clear to me that the Criminal Justice System was weaponised against her. Even if I was satisfied that an offence had been committed, I would have applied the Code and found a number of public interest factors against justifying a prosecution. I would have weighed that up against the backdrop of the protests and I still would have argued against a prosecution. There was no reason for her to be held on remand and certainly no reason to go through previous tweets. If they thought her tweet was enough to incite racial hatred then it ought to have stood on its own. It’s clear they were desperate to label her as a racist. I am ashamed at how appallingly Lucy was treated.
Can Prime minister Starmer be charged with Misfeasance? He is allowing 1000s of men to come to Britain who have been harassing abusing raping women girls/children and refuses to protect them and other British citizens from men we no nothing about.
This is from ai
In the UK, misfeasance in public office is a tort where a public officer abuses their power, either by intentionally harming someone or by acting recklessly or with indifference to the limits of their authority, knowing their actions will likely cause harm. It's not just about making a mistake; it requires deliberate misconduct and a realization that the actions could cause injury.
Key elements of misfeasance in public office:
Public officer:
The defendant must be a public officer exercising their power in an official capacity.
Abuse of power:
The officer must have either deliberately acted to injure someone or have known that their actions would probably cause harm.
Bad faith:
There must be an element of bad faith or deliberate misconduct, not just negligence or an honest mistake.
Causation:
The officer's actions must be the legal cause of the claimant's injuries.
Harm:
The claimant must have suffered actual harm or loss as a result of the officer's misconduct.
Two types of misfeasance:
Targeted malice:
Where the officer intentionally acts to harm a specific individual or group.
Untargeted malice:
Where the officer acts beyond their powers, knowing that their actions are likely to cause harm, even if not directed at a particular person.
Examples of misfeasance:
A police officer deliberately fabricating evidence to harm someone.
A council official awarding a contract to a friend, knowing it was against the rules and would disadvantage others.
A prison officer intentionally denying a prisoner access to medical care, knowing it would cause harm.
Distinction from negligence:
Misfeasance differs from negligence, which involves a lack of reasonable care, not deliberate misconduct. For misfeasance, there must be an element of deliberate wrongdoing or reckless disregard for the consequences of one's actions.
Recent developments:
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has issued updated guidance on misconduct in public office, which includes guidance on assessing the seriousness of the offense and the context of the relationship between the public officer and the victim.
There has been discussion about the effectiveness of using misfeasance in public office to address complex schemes involving financial irregularities.
The case of R v Ali highlights that "off-duty" behavior can still be considered misconduct in public office, particularly when the officer's role enables them to exert power or control over the victim.
Misconduct in Public Office | The Crown Prosecution Service
Ot was a truly wonderful interview Dan, Lucy was able to put herself and her experiences across in the best way possible and that's down to you,the inteviewer
Great interview Dan. She came across very well indeed.
Outstanding!!!!
Lucy is a hero. Glad she is meeting with the Trump administration. America can help liberate Britain from the woke jihad.
Such a great interview Dan - leaving no stone unturned 👏. Lucy came across so articulate and calm explaining everything you asked of her . It was such a pleasure to see her free and you being her first port of call for an interview. Being our champion for free speech she was in the very best of hands with you 👏👏👏❤️🇬🇧
Fantastic interview Dan. Just as you told us Lucy is not the evil racist the MSM & government want us to believe.
Personally I’d be going after that weirdo Femi & getting his balls hanging from the nearest tree (legally speaking). Terrorist my arse.
Well done & best wishes to Lucy & her family, they have all been through hell.
Fantastic work Dan
That woman done nothing wrong she should never be in jail
great stuff dan..... more and more people are slowly waking up to the very real danger of the online safety act as some of you are no doubt aware ive been banging the drum so to speak concerning the following petition on the uk government and parliament petition page...repeal the online safety act it currently has 528,474, signatures it urgently needs many more and YOU can help in getting them first be sure to sign it and most importantly be sure to reshare it widely all over the uk with as many like minded people as you possibly can and be sure to ask each one of them to do exactly the same as im asking you to do in this message....concerning the online safety act be sure to check out a page called the expose and in particular an article on there from yesterday concerning the online safety act its a must read article
Beautiful interview
Absolutely great show Dan, Lucy was brilliant i think the show will go viral well done. I also think that this will be the final nail in Starmer's coffins.
Thank you, Dan, for sharing Lucy’s story with us.
She’s so poised, such an articulate young woman. I’m so impressed with her in every way & I’m amazed at her calm demeanor.
I can’t imagine how I’d react to 380 days incarceration for expressing my thoughts. I’d love to think I’d behave as beautifully as Lucy but I don’t know if I could.
Well done.
Lucy made a mistake and quickly corrected it. That should have been taken into account.
We are rapidly losing freedom of expression. Free speech article:
https://hellish2050.substack.com/p/free-speech
The only mistake she made was to plead guilty. The comment she posted was a statement about how she felt and I suspect a majority of the indigenous British population feel much the same way. I know I do.
Sensational Dan what an amazing lady 👏 ❤️
Well done Dan Wootton 👏 👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏❤️
As a former colleague of Kier Starmer, I can say with some confidence that I would not have authorised a charge against Lucy Connolly. It is clear to me that the Criminal Justice System was weaponised against her. Even if I was satisfied that an offence had been committed, I would have applied the Code and found a number of public interest factors against justifying a prosecution. I would have weighed that up against the backdrop of the protests and I still would have argued against a prosecution. There was no reason for her to be held on remand and certainly no reason to go through previous tweets. If they thought her tweet was enough to incite racial hatred then it ought to have stood on its own. It’s clear they were desperate to label her as a racist. I am ashamed at how appallingly Lucy was treated.
Oh totally agree with you
Hi
Can Prime minister Starmer be charged with Misfeasance? He is allowing 1000s of men to come to Britain who have been harassing abusing raping women girls/children and refuses to protect them and other British citizens from men we no nothing about.
This is from ai
In the UK, misfeasance in public office is a tort where a public officer abuses their power, either by intentionally harming someone or by acting recklessly or with indifference to the limits of their authority, knowing their actions will likely cause harm. It's not just about making a mistake; it requires deliberate misconduct and a realization that the actions could cause injury.
Key elements of misfeasance in public office:
Public officer:
The defendant must be a public officer exercising their power in an official capacity.
Abuse of power:
The officer must have either deliberately acted to injure someone or have known that their actions would probably cause harm.
Bad faith:
There must be an element of bad faith or deliberate misconduct, not just negligence or an honest mistake.
Causation:
The officer's actions must be the legal cause of the claimant's injuries.
Harm:
The claimant must have suffered actual harm or loss as a result of the officer's misconduct.
Two types of misfeasance:
Targeted malice:
Where the officer intentionally acts to harm a specific individual or group.
Untargeted malice:
Where the officer acts beyond their powers, knowing that their actions are likely to cause harm, even if not directed at a particular person.
Examples of misfeasance:
A police officer deliberately fabricating evidence to harm someone.
A council official awarding a contract to a friend, knowing it was against the rules and would disadvantage others.
A prison officer intentionally denying a prisoner access to medical care, knowing it would cause harm.
Distinction from negligence:
Misfeasance differs from negligence, which involves a lack of reasonable care, not deliberate misconduct. For misfeasance, there must be an element of deliberate wrongdoing or reckless disregard for the consequences of one's actions.
Recent developments:
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has issued updated guidance on misconduct in public office, which includes guidance on assessing the seriousness of the offense and the context of the relationship between the public officer and the victim.
There has been discussion about the effectiveness of using misfeasance in public office to address complex schemes involving financial irregularities.
The case of R v Ali highlights that "off-duty" behavior can still be considered misconduct in public office, particularly when the officer's role enables them to exert power or control over the victim.
Misconduct in Public Office | The Crown Prosecution Service
7 Jul 2023
The Crown Prosecution Service
I see Allison Pearson of the Telegraph is also claiming an exclusive.