The rumour about Starmer’s involvement in the Southport incident is already out there. Are we talking about the same thing, in that several years ago, Starmer acted in his capacity as a human rights lawyer and, had it not been for those actions, those girls would still be alive? Starmer would rather send hundreds of angry and hurt citizens to prison than they learn the truth - about him!
Is there anything about this man’s life that could be called good in any way? If this story is true he’s going to be called guilty in the only court that matters, the court of public opinion. As they used to say “up with this we will not put”.
Some coordinated (but you can't comment on) news stories I saw earlier today (Mail, etc) seemed to try and suggest Mr SStarmer was not, at least, defending the father of the choirboy who has no older pictures shared by the complicit media than the little angel in his school blazer. I cannot comment on the veracity of the claim, or the denial given.
Whilst law abiding taxpayers are incarcerated & mugshots of them are plastered all over the place. The British people are being persecuted by their own government- I never thought I would live to see the day.
I’ve just seen the Mail thanks. Then Dan must just be talking about the cover up concerning the offender being a terrorist and at what point Starmer will have known that fact.
There was something posted that Starmer in his role as a human rights lawyer advocated for 9 iffy men one of whom was the father of this killer
There really is a cover up
The proverbial will hit the fan when all this comes out. People jailed for telling the truth is just so shocking. No-one told us the truth when it was mooted Rudakubaner was a Christian because it suited the government narrative. Just so awful I can barely contain my anger
Yes this rumour has been debunked in the Mail today. Starmer did indeed assist a number of people, but apparently none of them turned out to be the father of the offender. I think Dan must instead be referring to the point at which Starmer became aware of a connection to terrorism. But, yes, the state and the main stream media are trying to manage the general public and keep us in the dark.
The offenders Dad was a terrorist in Africa & committed heinous crimes. Starmer defended him in court & he was allowed to stay in our country. His son went on to slaughter the little girls.
Hi Donna, the only thing that Dan did not say, I'm sure, was the exact date that Starmer was defending the father - which many claim could have been 19th February 2003. There is no doubt that on or around that time, Starmer successfully prevented his deportation and subsequent approved asylum claim. Starmer is slippery and deceitful - his nickname at the CPS when he was DPP was "wet wipe"! In other words he kept his arse clean and would not entertain having any involvement in any contentious case (Grooming gangs, Saville, El Fayed etc)!!
As PM, Starmer would have been notified straight away about terrorist links. Remember he was at pains to tell us that the killer of the little girls was Welsh and Christian ? Did we believe it ? Not a chance !
I am still seething about the riots and resulting labelling of anyone who has an issue with uncontrolled migration as far right bigots.
The riots happened because people are finding it increasingly difficult to access ever-diminishing public services, and can clearly see the situation worsening with rapidly expanding population. They are living in areas which have been deprived for more than 40 years; poor transport infrastructure, no skilled jobs, failing schools, lack of hospital facilities, forgotten about. I don't believe it is 'far right' to want to feel, and be treated as a respected equal here. All it took was the spark of the Southport murders to shine a light on it.
If what’s being said about Southport and the cover up is true it’s hard to see Starmer surviving. Doing his job as a lawyer is one thing bad though it sounds. Covering up is another. Could this force a GE? If this is true there’s going to be very annoyed people. But let’s wait and see.
If the Daily Mail story put out by No10 is true then 2TK didn’t represent the father. I think we do need to know whether the father was represented and if so by whom?
When the light of truth is shone on evil - it begins to disintegrate - evil is darkness in human thought and action and light dispels darkness . Keep shining that light of truth all you wonderful people .
I imagine the Parents of those little girls thought it more than a trivial matter. Starmer has no conception of pain or anguish, he just blithely trots out utter crap and doesn't care who gets hurt in the process.
Australian here. We are watching the Starmageddon situation closely. Australia is heading down the same path with our Labour Government making moves to control what we can say , hear and see.
No, be fair, in all likelihood this 'never crossed his desk'. The same lame excuse he used for the Rotherham Sex Grooming scandal, the Horizon Post Office scandal and Jimmy Saville.
This is becoming like the dark side of Monty Python's "Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!" Except that it's become the British Inquisition. This cannot stand.
It's not fair that people been jailed for such long times(sentences) for getting carried away with themselves at protests, yet real criminals are released to make room for not real criminals and not real criminals given longer sentences than the real ones. It's madness. The not real criminals could have been used to help repair pot holes or been used to collect litter off the streets and cleaning graffiti, for a few weeks. Not this LONG "You will regret your actions" prison sentence.
Is the jigsaw finally coming together? A few of us warned what Starmer and his government would be like before the election, including far more prominent voices than mine such as Peter Hitchens and David Starkey, but very few listened. A few at least now say to me that I was right, though they're still a small number in truth. One big part of the jigsaw still missing for me is why Sunak was so desperate to call an early election and then seemingly chuck it. Imagine if the election campaign was starting now. He was entitled to wait until December. If he wanted to just give it up he could have just stepped aside for a new leader. His party has got through enough leaders. What difference would one more have made?
Quite a lot of things "did not cross" SStarmer's desk at various times, or perhaps he was distracted. All coincidental no doubt, and bad luck, rather than anything more odious. Bad luck just attracts itself to some people I guess.
The above has been sanitised slightly due to the underlying regime in the UK today and no doubt fear of extradition on some trumped up national security nonsense...
The rumour about Starmer’s involvement in the Southport incident is already out there. Are we talking about the same thing, in that several years ago, Starmer acted in his capacity as a human rights lawyer and, had it not been for those actions, those girls would still be alive? Starmer would rather send hundreds of angry and hurt citizens to prison than they learn the truth - about him!
Is there anything about this man’s life that could be called good in any way? If this story is true he’s going to be called guilty in the only court that matters, the court of public opinion. As they used to say “up with this we will not put”.
There is much more to come out. He’s an odious individual. Don’t forget, he also has that super injunction too!
Absolutely spot on. It's called "blood on his hands"!
Exactly!
Some coordinated (but you can't comment on) news stories I saw earlier today (Mail, etc) seemed to try and suggest Mr SStarmer was not, at least, defending the father of the choirboy who has no older pictures shared by the complicit media than the little angel in his school blazer. I cannot comment on the veracity of the claim, or the denial given.
Whilst law abiding taxpayers are incarcerated & mugshots of them are plastered all over the place. The British people are being persecuted by their own government- I never thought I would live to see the day.
I’ve just seen the Mail thanks. Then Dan must just be talking about the cover up concerning the offender being a terrorist and at what point Starmer will have known that fact.
There was something posted that Starmer in his role as a human rights lawyer advocated for 9 iffy men one of whom was the father of this killer
There really is a cover up
The proverbial will hit the fan when all this comes out. People jailed for telling the truth is just so shocking. No-one told us the truth when it was mooted Rudakubaner was a Christian because it suited the government narrative. Just so awful I can barely contain my anger
Yes this rumour has been debunked in the Mail today. Starmer did indeed assist a number of people, but apparently none of them turned out to be the father of the offender. I think Dan must instead be referring to the point at which Starmer became aware of a connection to terrorism. But, yes, the state and the main stream media are trying to manage the general public and keep us in the dark.
The offenders Dad was a terrorist in Africa & committed heinous crimes. Starmer defended him in court & he was allowed to stay in our country. His son went on to slaughter the little girls.
This is indeed the rumour but mainstream media is denying Starmer had anything to with the dad staying in the UK.
What did Mandy Rice Davis say ? Well he would say that wouldn’t he?
Spot on - once had to do a covert "tail" of her and Christine Keeler!
Hi Donna, the only thing that Dan did not say, I'm sure, was the exact date that Starmer was defending the father - which many claim could have been 19th February 2003. There is no doubt that on or around that time, Starmer successfully prevented his deportation and subsequent approved asylum claim. Starmer is slippery and deceitful - his nickname at the CPS when he was DPP was "wet wipe"! In other words he kept his arse clean and would not entertain having any involvement in any contentious case (Grooming gangs, Saville, El Fayed etc)!!
Oh I’m well aware of his reputation. I am a former prosecutor and worked with him whilst he was DPP!
This rumour was refuted in the Mail today. Dan must be referring to the point at which Starmer became aware of the offender’s links to terrorism.
As PM, Starmer would have been notified straight away about terrorist links. Remember he was at pains to tell us that the killer of the little girls was Welsh and Christian ? Did we believe it ? Not a chance !
Did not believe it for a second!
We live under a Communist Dictatorship!Doesn’t give me any confidence in lawyers!
I am still seething about the riots and resulting labelling of anyone who has an issue with uncontrolled migration as far right bigots.
The riots happened because people are finding it increasingly difficult to access ever-diminishing public services, and can clearly see the situation worsening with rapidly expanding population. They are living in areas which have been deprived for more than 40 years; poor transport infrastructure, no skilled jobs, failing schools, lack of hospital facilities, forgotten about. I don't believe it is 'far right' to want to feel, and be treated as a respected equal here. All it took was the spark of the Southport murders to shine a light on it.
We so desperately need to remove this disgraceful, lying communist and his entire cabal.
If the MSM are not reporting these isuues, thank god we have you Dan. Keep at it!
If what’s being said about Southport and the cover up is true it’s hard to see Starmer surviving. Doing his job as a lawyer is one thing bad though it sounds. Covering up is another. Could this force a GE? If this is true there’s going to be very annoyed people. But let’s wait and see.
We can get as angry as we like but Starmer and his evil cabal will just ignore it and carry on regardless.
If the Daily Mail story put out by No10 is true then 2TK didn’t represent the father. I think we do need to know whether the father was represented and if so by whom?
When the light of truth is shone on evil - it begins to disintegrate - evil is darkness in human thought and action and light dispels darkness . Keep shining that light of truth all you wonderful people .
Brilliant commentary Dan. We need more journalists like you to stand up for the truth.
A trivial domestic matter. Oh so revealing! I just wonder what that might be. Might it involve an elevation to a seat in the House of Lords?
I imagine the Parents of those little girls thought it more than a trivial matter. Starmer has no conception of pain or anguish, he just blithely trots out utter crap and doesn't care who gets hurt in the process.
Read that in another certain light... Oh those claims were denied too.
Denied with a Super Injunction I am advised.
Australian here. We are watching the Starmageddon situation closely. Australia is heading down the same path with our Labour Government making moves to control what we can say , hear and see.
No, be fair, in all likelihood this 'never crossed his desk'. The same lame excuse he used for the Rotherham Sex Grooming scandal, the Horizon Post Office scandal and Jimmy Saville.
So glad people are exposing this disgraceful cover up of two tier
This is becoming like the dark side of Monty Python's "Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!" Except that it's become the British Inquisition. This cannot stand.
It's not fair that people been jailed for such long times(sentences) for getting carried away with themselves at protests, yet real criminals are released to make room for not real criminals and not real criminals given longer sentences than the real ones. It's madness. The not real criminals could have been used to help repair pot holes or been used to collect litter off the streets and cleaning graffiti, for a few weeks. Not this LONG "You will regret your actions" prison sentence.
Is the jigsaw finally coming together? A few of us warned what Starmer and his government would be like before the election, including far more prominent voices than mine such as Peter Hitchens and David Starkey, but very few listened. A few at least now say to me that I was right, though they're still a small number in truth. One big part of the jigsaw still missing for me is why Sunak was so desperate to call an early election and then seemingly chuck it. Imagine if the election campaign was starting now. He was entitled to wait until December. If he wanted to just give it up he could have just stepped aside for a new leader. His party has got through enough leaders. What difference would one more have made?
Quite a lot of things "did not cross" SStarmer's desk at various times, or perhaps he was distracted. All coincidental no doubt, and bad luck, rather than anything more odious. Bad luck just attracts itself to some people I guess.
The above has been sanitised slightly due to the underlying regime in the UK today and no doubt fear of extradition on some trumped up national security nonsense...