"If they used a surrogate, admit it!" Meghan Markle's father casts doubt on birth of Archie and Lilibet
A growing potential scandal that the MSM's royal rota refuses to cover
OUR BIGGEST EVER SALE WITH 30% OFF FOR BLACK FRIDAY!
SUPPORT OUTSPOKEN & GET ACCESS TO THE UNCANCELLED AFTERSHOW EVERY WEEKDAY FOR A RECORD LOW PRICE
This Outspoken Substack is the exclusive home of my original journalism, columns AND now, by popular demand, the Uncancelled Aftershow. It is a safe space free of censorship and, your support, not only gives you 30 minutes of extra content every weekday, but it also means you are helping me create an independent media revolution. With the corrupt MSM now controlled by billionaire corporate overlords and dark establishment forces, I am no longer owned by anybody other than you. Subscribing also allows you to read all the posts exclusively for paid members, access to the full archive, the ability to comment on articles and engage in debate with me, join my regular chats on the Substack app, and send me direct messages.
The whole purpose of being independent was to cover stories the MSM are too weak, too captured or too afraid to touch.
When it comes to coverage of the British monarchy that means challenging the so-called Royal Rota of official UK-based court reporters, something I promised to do from the launch of Outspoken.
That means covering the highly controversial and sensitive issue of whether Meghan Markle gave birth to her own two children Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet because if she did not they must be removed from the line of succession to take the throne.
IT DIDN’T MOVE OR BLINK
Today, as she turns 60, Meghan’s sister Samantha Markle makes an extraordinary intervention, telling me in an exclusive Outspoken interview that even their own father Thomas Markle now doubts the story about his grandchildren.
OUTSPOKEN: Have you discussed it with your father, Thomas?
SAMANTHA MARKLE: Yeah, he said the same. He said the same thing. I don't believe and he doesn't believe that there are kids because you don't yank around and use alleged children as pawns so much. We're only going to let you see our children if you behave in a certain way and we can control the landscape.I mean, it was it was like really sick and contrived. And I think he got to the point where, you know, excuse my French BS. this is not how you treat human beings about something so special and so important as family, whether it's the line of succession or genealogy and the ability to see, quote, grandchildren before you pass away. A lot of family members want that. If just to be able to have a point of reference, write something down in the family memoirs that, you know, here's another addition to the family. So I think I think it's been a very cruel game and I think he accepts it. And he even said, he said, we've seen this much of this kid and with bandages around his face, like it didn't move or blink or anything. And, and that was very weird. Every newborn I've ever seen, you know, moves, blinks, makes a noise, stretches or something. And he felt that right off the bat.
There is so much more on this dramatic new turn of events from the Markle family, which you can watch in full below in our exclusive interview for paid members…
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Dan Wootton Outspoken to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.